The question is whether the selection criteria are correct, fair and proper. In my opinion, in this case it is not. I believe, and this may not be the opinion of Mobilis, given the amount of time drugs cheats have been among our sport it is hard to believe that this scenario has not been predicted and the consequences clarified. Listening to reports of Neils de Vos, the recently appointed Chief Executive of UKA, I can’t imagine that the present criteria would still be in place if he’d have had his way and had the time to have dealt with it.
The public are looking at all our governing bodies to ‘do the right thing’ both morally and professionally, but UKA have been unable to make a stand against what is clearly an inappropriate selection due to an ineffective selection protocol. In this day of political correctness-gone-mad, can we please have some common sense about this issue?
The problems that I have with this selection are:
- He is preventing a young and promising athlete from competing and gaining valuable experience at a world class event.
- He is compromising how our Olympic athletes, our Olympic movement and even our country are being portrayed.
- It comes over very strongly that we are condoning drugs cheats.